Annie Lennox
Passion Player
A feature by Alan Franks
After an intense conversation with Annie Lennox, I am convinced I know why she does the things she does. If that sounds presumptuous, I can only say that rock music has always provoked bold, bald statements. First, she has suffered from bouts of depression since she was 14 in her home town of Aberdeen; secondly, her father and grandfather were trade unionists of the old school, committed to improving the lot of the underdog.
“Many people,” she says, “have a fairly s****y life.” She is not trying to include herself in the category, although she has had her moments. “I love people who have principles and stick by them.” Again, she doesn’t claim to be of their number, only to want to “put the ideals that I have into some kind of symmetry with what I do for a living”.
Now 52, she says these things with the same fervour she has brought to her singing these past 30 years with the Eurythmics and as a soloist. Regularly called the greatest white soul singer alive, she is a musical counterpart to the conviction politician. As a result of this, not to mention her feminism and her striking androgyny, some regard her as scary, whereas the truth is surely that she is passionate.
“If I were just promoting my records,” she goes on, “I would be disgusted with myself.” As with the delivery of the songs – Would I Lie to You? springs to mind – she dares you to doubt her. Still, there is no getting around the fact that she is releasing a new album called Songs of Mass Destruction. It contains several moving compositions that come from this rueful vision of hers. Last month she headlined an Albert Hall concert for Peace One Day, the organisation behind the UN’s adoption of September 21 as a fixed date in the calendar for conflicts to be suspended. Her half-hour set, which included the new single, Dark Road, had a blistering honesty about it, and an absence of ego that seemed appropriate to the occasion. On that showing, it would be hard to argue with her own assessment that her voice is in its prime and that she is “closer to my cutting edge than ever before”.
Lennox’s involvement with this organisation started several years ago when she attended an event it had put on at Brixton Academy and was asked to read out a speech written by the Dalai Lama. When she talks about this and her other great involvement, with the South African Aids activists’ group TAC (Treatment Action Campaign), she does so with an energy that leaves you in no doubt that these callings are as urgent to her as was her teenage music vocation. She recalls her sense of awe at seeing Nelson Mandela standing outside his old cell on Robben Island rejoicing in the defeat of apartheid but warning of the greater struggle against the “genocide” of Aids.
Aids has now become for her not only a cause to be helped financially, but a theme of her songwriting. On Songs of Mass Destruction there is one called Sing, which incorporates a track by the TAC members group called the Generics. As message songs go, it carries a highly specific one, calling for the national implementation of a programme to prevent HIV transmission from mothers to babies. Lennox contacted 23 female singers of global renown, asking them to join her on the recording; hence the presence of Madonna, Céline Dion, kd lang, Beverley Knight, Sarah McLachlan, Shakira, KT Tunstall, Martha Wainwright, Bonnie Raitt, Joss Stone, Gladys Knight and others.
The idea is to put the track on the internet, with the profits from downloads sent to support TAC initiatives. You could see this as a practical enactment of the Eurythmics’ 1985 hit with Aretha Franklin, Sisters are Doin’ it for Themselves; whatever else it is, or does, it is a huge feminist anthem, with the endorsement of the ultimate girls’ superchoir.
“I can’t understand why it [feminism] has become such a scurvy word,” says Lennox. “I find that odd. I think people are a little scared to use it. I’m not. I’m saying it loud and strong. When I go to poor countries and see women labouring in the fields, carrying loads on their back as well as children, I think that what they need is empowerment. You can be a man and a feminist, too. It’s just about social and political rights. Until women finally get a better deal, we need feminism.
“Something happened, around the 1980s, when women started to become
ashamed. Maybe there were a few too many brazen hussies, and maybe that
was a bit of a turn-off, I don’t know. But you have to remember that
women died for the vote and we still don’t have equal rights. Many men
are quite threatened, I know, by the new phenomenon of women. I
understand that; the male ego can be a frail thing – so too can the
female, actually – and here are women getting top jobs. On a personal
level it must be threatening.”